Showing posts with label LaTex links. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LaTex links. Show all posts

Friday, January 4, 2013

Scribe Post 1/4/13

     We started our first full class of 2013 with a super-correction follow up test.  After 40 minutes of showing off our knowledge of derivatives and optimization we moved on to a new and very scary subject:
THE SLOPE FIELD
     Yeah, I know, it looks really hard, but it is actually really simple! This particular slope field is of the equation .  In order to make the slope field from this equation you simply start plugging in points! For this particular example we will start with the point (1,1).  Plug this into the equation so =-1.  This means that the slope at (1,1) is -1.  How does this relate to our slope field?
 Put a short line segment at (1,1) with a slope of -1.  During class there was some confusion on how long to make the segment.  It actually doesn't matter how long you make your segments.  Just make them a length that looks good!
     So you have one slope, continue plugging in points, keep plugging them in until you have a good idea of what will happen as far as slope.  In slope field problems you will be given a point such as (3,3) at which you need to evaluate your slope field.  You can then find the slope at that point and follow where it is pointing.  Keep following the slopes until you have a line!
     If you did this on the slope field above you would have a circle!
 If you want to make a slope field on Geogebra look at this website. I didn't try, but you're welcome to: https://prep11geogebra.pbworks.com/w/page/37697579/SlopeFieldsGeoGebra4
     
    Now O'Brien gave us a preview of a future lesson: how to solve a differential equation algebraically.




  

Up to the last step everything should make sense. Those squiggle things mean take the antiderivative.
As O'Brien said, this is not something to be freaking out about right now because we are just looking ahead. 
When you solve the equation you end up with an intercept (c) of 9
So, using the equation for a circle we find that 
and the radius is the square root of 18.
Okay, now that everybody is thoroughly confused lets have a recap of the fun game we played!

After an intense competition the medal platform had Gabe and Eben at the top with a gold, the dream team of JOC and #Calrobbins came in a close second, taking the silver and in a moment of pure euphoria Conor Hart celebrated his tie for the bronze with his teammate Claire, they tied Duncan and Eddie in third.

Next scribe? possibly you!





Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Scribe Post 10/2

     We started class with a quick warmup that focused mostly on using our calculators to find derivatives numerically and graphically(to do it numerically math 8, function, x, value of x, precision(optional)). It is really hard to explain without a visual so here is a youtube video from DrPhilClark
   
     Just for review, in order to find a symmetric difference quotient use the equation   .  Mr. O'Brien told us that the calculator does not have mystical elves working inside to find the derivative for us, but instead it just uses this equation.  In order to graph a derivative on your calculator use the syntax illustrated by the picture below:

     The function we looked at in the warmup is the Y1 function in the picture above, and the picture below shows the graph of the function  :


     When we looked at the graph we found that when the slope was positive, the door was opening, and when the slope was negative, the door was closing.
      At this point Mr. O'Brien made a graph FURRY and I noticed some people wanted to know how to make their own furry graphs. For those of you who dont know how to do that here is a little video I made.  Go to the y= window and press the left key a bunch of times. Once you have the line next to Y1 alternating from / to _ just press enter: 



      Mr. O'Brien showed us something strange: when we graph the original and derivative together, the vertical scale on the graph is used for both y and y'.  On the original function, the points were in the form (time, º), but the derivative showed (time, º/second). In other words, the original shows (x,y), and the derivative shows (x, slope). The original is in blue and the derivative is in red

     After further investigation we found that there was a zero for the graph of the derivative.  We knew this because the graph started above the x axis with a y intercept of 200, and dropped below with a minimum value at about (2.885, -27.067).  According to the Intermediate Value Theorem* because 0 is between 200 and -27.067, at some point with an x value between 0 and 2.885, the function will cross the x axis.  The x value of zero for the derivative was the x value of the Maximum of the original function!  At that point, the door is neither opening or closing.
*for review of the Intermediate Value theorem check Sarah's blog post

    In order to use solver on the calculator press the MATH key then scroll down to SOLVER. Enter your equation, then press ALPHA, SOLVE(ENTER). For a more in depth explanation watch this very basic video on Solver by learning4mastery.  It involves a quadratic, but the basic concepts are applicable to derivatives.  You may not even need to watch much if you're just looking for keystrokes.

     If you have already entered a function into the y= window and you are feeling a little lazy, you can copy that function by pressing the VARS key then the right arrow to get to Y-VARS, press ENTER on the "Function" option and then select the equation you want.
     For more calculator help check out this website.
    While working on the warmup we learned new vocabulary: a Point of Inflection is the point of a graph at which the slopes curvature changes signs, or in our example below, the point at d(2.885). Flecto in Latin means to bend.  Inflection is the point at which the function changes from bending down to bending up! It goes from concave to convex! Check out wolframs definition here.



(side note: O'Brien reminded us that sinø/ø is not 1, but the lim of sin/ as x-> =1)
     A question was raised about #2 on the test, which related to #3 of the practice test(IW#8). On #3, it looked like the lines only crossed 2 times, but we have to remember that an exponential equation does shoot up eventually.
Question 3
At how many points do the graphs of the functions   (in red) and
(in blue) intersect?

At first it appears that there are only 2 intersections at points C and D, however, if we zoom WAY out we find that there is a third intersection at point E below. 



    In the same way #2 on the test at first looked like this:
How many zeroes does the function g(x)=sin(ln x) have for 0< x ≥1?
when we graph this function on a simple window we get this:
Okay, so now you might say "easy 2 intersections." Instead when you zoom in you can see 3 below, and if you zoom in more, and more, you will find more and more zeroes. The sin made the ln(x) oscillate as it got close to 0.  We usually wont be able to see these types of things on graphing calculators, but instead we need to see things like the fact that as we plug numbers close to 0 into ln(x) we get infinitely small numbers.  Then when you put all of those numbers into sine, you get numbers oscillating between -1 and 1 infinitely.  Finally by using the intermediate value theorem we see that if there are infinite oscillations over the x axis, then there is an infinite amount of 0s :








Now we checked out the Power Rule, Mr. O'Brien showed us how the rule worked with the following example:

This table shows a function of a certain power and it's derivatives.  Notice it works for negative and fractional exponents too!

The Power Rule and the Damian Trick are the same thing! when the function is , the derivative is .  What a POWERful function!

We went to the thatquiz links posted by O'Brien to work on using this rule and class ended.

     If there is a coefficient on the X, ignore the coefficient at first: k*f '(x). It is the same thing just more mathematical than the explanation offered by physics. You can prove the mathematical way by using limits to find the derivative, you take the k out to find the limit, then multiply by k.


FORESHADOWING:
Sum/Difference Rule:
[f(x)+g(x)]=f'(x)+g'(x)
[f(x)-g(x)]=f'(x)-g'(x)

The ln(3x)= ln(3)+ln(x)
       ln(20)=ln(4)+ln(5)
       ln(20)=ln(2)+ln(10)
       ln(20)=ln(1)+ln(20)
So: horizontal dilations of a derivative would be simply a translation for all log functions!

UPDATE:

I mentioned the sum/difference rule above, but what about the product and quotient rules?
Product rule:
So with this rule, you multiply f(x) with the derivative of g(x) and vise-versa, then simply add the products and you have the derivative of a product!
The Quotient rule is similar, but with a few crazy differences:
Notice that in the numerator it is the same as the product rule with one key difference: SUBTRACTION.  Also, notice the funky denominator: g(x) squared.


Cal

 NEXT SCRIBE: jk, side deals going down, Will is the next scribe again…

   

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Scribe Post 9/20

As Crockett decided not to come to class today, I, Cole, have volunteered to take his place as scribe.

We began class today with an exploration worksheet of a piecewise function, seen below.



The first question examined f(x) when k=1. We were told to sketch the graph which should look like the image below.

 


The discontinuity seen at x=2 will be noticed as a jump discontinuity, when k=1. We then sought to determine the positive and negative limits of f(x) as x approaches 2, seen below.



As we have learned earlier, for a function to be continuous at a point, both of the single-sided limits must equal the value of f(x) at the x values which the limits approach.  As the right limit is influenced by k, and the right limit was three times the value of the left limit, we reasoned that a k value of 1/3 would make the two limits approach the same value of 3 as x approaches two.  When we implemented this hypothesis, we discovered that a k value of 1/3 did indeed make the function continuous at x=2.  However, the function was still not locally linear at x=2, as there was a cusp at that value.  A cusp, derived from the Latin cuspis - "point or apex," is the pointed meeting of two curves, seen below.


Once we had defined what a cusp was, we transitioned to looking over the Quiz.  Two free points were given to account for small mistakes.  The first four questions were simple limit questions which relied on factoring polynomials and finding clever ways to obtain the GOLDEN LIMIT (below)



Number two (below) was a little bit tricky, but if we remember the relationship between sin(x)/x and sin(2x)/x, then the expression can be simplified to a slope over slope relationship, 3/7.  If limits are still a problem, the rules of limits can be found here or on page 61 of our textbook.


We continued through, pausing at both five and six, which questioned our knowledge of the properties of limits and the classification of different discontinuities.  These principles can be found right after the fire drill in Scotty's scribe post.  Seven and eight were not too eventful, and the Bonus was shown to be simple after a little bit of working (shown below).



After we finished the quiz, we moved on to IW #7, starting with four (below).


When we graphed this function, we observed that x^2 was approaching 0 at twice the rate that 1-cos(x) was approaching zero.  Therefore, the limit was equal to 1/2.  An algebraic solution to this equation can be seen below.



Skipping over five, six, and seven, we moved on to eight and examined Instantaneous Rate of Change. The first part of eight asked us to find average rate of change, or slope, which is a rudimentary mathematical working which will not be gracing this post with its presence.  However, we were then asked to find the rate of change at a point.  This is done in a similar way to finding average rate of change, but its results are mich more useful.  If we take the function g(x) and appraise it at two points, (0, g(0)) and (c,g(c)), and evaluate the limit as c approaches zero, we will find the Instantaneous Rate of Change.



How to find Derivatives

Limit Definition
Local Linearity (seen above with g(c) and g(0))
nDeriv(function, x, point) - on Graphic Calculator under the MATH menu
WolframAlpha
g'(2) on GeoGebra

The following is the "Ms. Damian Way" of finding limits.

Consider: v=t^2
Acceleration (Instantaneous Rate of Change): a=v'=2t
The following is the proof for this way of finding derivatives.


NOTE: The Ms. Damian Way does not play nicely with natural logarithms or trigonometric functions, it only likes power (polynomial) functions.  Here is a great video that goes through this process step by step and gives a formula to find the derivative of a function (below).


NOTE: The notation (dy)/(dx) is what is used to show that you are taking the derivative of a function. You may notice that it is similar to (∆y)/(∆x), which we used to show average rate of change.  As the derivative shows instantaneous rate of change, it requires its own notation.

If the concept of instantaneous rate of change is still a little hazy, this interactive applet may be helpful.  It evaluates the derivative and a secant of a parabolic, exponential, and hyperbolic equation as well as that of a sine curve.  If you are confounded by the applet, which takes a little bit of examination to understand, then you can read this post on M∆th Sc∞p which does a very good job of differentiating between secant and tangent lines and their application to derivatives.

UPDATE: Now, we no longer need any of these rules to differentiate equations.  After IWs 10, and 11, we can tackle any functions involving trig, inverse trig, exponential, or logarithmic functions. For example, even this monster (below) can now be solved using the rules we have learned.



Although we can solve this, after a few steps, it becomes rather insane, so it is much easier to use tech to solve this problem.  nDeriv(f(x), x, any x value) can evaluate this function at any point.  Even though it does not yield a function equation, it can tell us what the derivative is of that monster at a point.  For example, when x=3 is ~35362601.44.  Although it doesn't tell us anything about the graph, and shouldn't be relied on to find derivatives, nDeriv can be useful in evaluating complex derivatives at singular points.

END OF UPDATE

To finish off class, we received a practice version of a Finely Crafted Opportunity Day, which will serve as our eighth assignment.  As many of our classmates will not be here friday, due to the very exciting Common Ground Fair, we are now on our own for studying for the TEST ON MONDAY.  Although we will be going over parts of the practice test on friday, as it is own independent work.

When we went over the practice test, a number of questions were focused on.  The main skills that the problems focused on were the ability to simplify a limit by factoring and using conjugate FUFOO's, and the ability to graph a function based on a set of parameters involving single- and double-sided limits.  Remember to look for the small negative signs on limits, as they are easy to miss.

As an aside, here is a google doc that I have created which contains helpful LaTex formulas for weird functions.  Anyone can edit and add formulas, so please contribute with your own formulas.  Here is a website that also has a number of helpful LaTex function formulas.

THE NEXT SCRIBE WILL STILL BE CROCKETT
(If he has the audacity to show up to class on Wednesday...)

One final thing, I found a cool animation of the instantaneous rate of change, or slope of a point, on a curve and thought I might add it in at the end.  It plots slope over x values, which creates an interesting curve.

UPDATE: We now know that this animation is plotting the derivative of a function with a high power of at least x^4.  The line that moves on the function is tangent to the function, so its slope is the instantaneous rate of change of the blue function.